References
Allen, I. E & Seeman, J. (2006). Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States. ALN Report. Source - Synopsis
Baker, E. (2004). Aligning Curriculum, Standards, and Assessments: Fulfilling the Promise of School Reform. CSE Report Source - Our Synopsis
Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructive-compatible computer usage (Report no. 7). Irvine, CA: Teaching, Learning, and Computing. Retrieved January 23, 2005 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_7/startpage.html.
Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301-318. Source – Synopsis
Brown - Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Notes
Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools. Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press. Source– Our Synopsis
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M. & Rachor, R. A. (1995/1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159-180. Source – Synopsis
Clark C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching. (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan. Synopsis
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technology in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232. Synopsis
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B. and Bentz, J. (1994). Class-wide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge ofstudent diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537. (Alternatively Source) - Synopsis
Gehring, J. (2005). Big-district priorities. Education Week, 24(35), 38-39. Source – Synopsis
Graney, S. B., & Shinn, Mark R. (2005). Effects of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) teacher feedback in general education classrooms. The School Psychology Review, 34(2). 184-201. Source– Synopsis
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Hall, R. P., Knudsen, J. & Greeno, J. G. (1995). A case study of systemic aspects of assessment technologies. Educational Assessment, 3(4) 315-61. Source – Synopsis
Hoff, D. J.(2005). NCLB focuses on data tools. Education Week, 24(35), 5-17. Source – Synopsis
Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258-1287. Source – Synopsis.
Kennedy, M. F. (1994). Instructional design or personal heuristics in classroom instructional planning. Educational Technology, 34(3), 17-25.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Education Schools Project. Source - Notes
Lockee, B., Moore, D., & Burton, J. (2004). Foundations of programmed instruction. In AECT handook . . . Our Synopsis
Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London : RoutledgeFalmer. Source– Our Synopsis
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES](1999). Teachers’ feelings of preparedness. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Source
Nevada State Educational Technology Plan Source - Notes
Streifer, P. A. (2002). Using data to make better educational decisions. London: Scarecrow Press Source - Notes.
U.S. Department of Education (2004) Toward A New Golden Age in American Education: How the Internet, the Law and Today’s Students Are Revolutionizing Expectations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Source - Synopsis.
http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/teachers-data-use-2005-2007/teachers-data-use-2005-2007-intro.html - U.S. Dept. of Education.
Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving Teachers in Data-Driven Decision Making: Using Computer Data Systems to Support Teacher Inquiry and Reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 10(3), 295-308. Abstract Link–Source– Our Synopsis Link
Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S. & Millard, M. O. (2004). Software for disaggregating and reporting student data: Moving beyond “No Child Left Behind” to inform classroom practice. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Source– Our Synopsis
Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S. & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software Enabling School Improvement Through Analysis of Student Data. Source - Our Synopsis
Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & DeYoung, T. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Information, 5(2), 183-206. Source - Notes
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A., (2003). Factors affecting technology use in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal. 40( 4) 807-40.
