===== References ===== Allen, I. E & Seeman, J. (2006). Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States. ALN Report. [[http://aln.org/publications/survey/pdf/making_the_grade.pdf|Source]] - [[Allen (2006)|Synopsis]] [[http://web2teach.com | Web2Teach]] - [[Baker, E. (2004) | Synopsis]] Baker, E. (2004). Aligning Curriculum, Standards, and Assessments: Fulfilling the Promise of School Reform. CSE Report [[http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/reports/r645.pdf | Source]] - [[Baker, E. (2004) | Our Synopsis]] {{becker_reil_2000.pdf|Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000)}}. Teacher professional engagement and constructive-compatible computer usage (Report no. 7). Irvine, CA: Teaching, Learning, and Computing. Retrieved January 23, 2005 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_7/startpage.html. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301-318. [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&an=2004-22349-004 | Source]] -- [[Brown, G. T. L., (2004) | Synopsis]] Brown - Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. [[The Social Life of Information|Notes]] Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). //Purposeful restructuring creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools.// Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press. [[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=purposeful+restructuring%3A+Creating+a+culture+for+learning+and+achievement+in+elementary+schools&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Search| Source]]--[[Chrispeels, J. H. (1992) | Our Synopsis ]] Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M. & Rachor, R. A. (1995/1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159-180. [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=7403294 | Source]] -- [[Cizek, G. J. et al (1995/1996) | Synopsis]] Clark C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching. (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan. [[Clark C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986)|Synopsis]] {{cuban_kirkpatrick_2001.pdf|Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001)}}. High access and low use of technology in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. //Exceptional Children, 52//, 219-232. [[Deno, S. L. (1985) | Synopsis]] Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B. and Bentz, J. (1994). Class-wide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge ofstudent diversity. //Exceptional Children, 60,// 518-537. (Alternatively [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=17289005 | Source]]) - [[Fuchs, L. S. et al (1994) | Synopsis]] Gehring, J. (2005). Big-district priorities. //Education Week, 24//(35), 38-39. [[http://ewdev.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35costs-s1.h24.html | Source]] -- [[Gehring, J. (2005) | Synopsis]] Graney, S. B., & Shinn, Mark R. (2005). Effects of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) teacher feedback in general education classrooms. //The School Psychology Review, 34//(2). 184-201. [[http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/hww/jumpstart.jhtml?recid=0bc05f7a67b1790e21c3ad2aa015c03a754a9e9953a93ad4f33e66cbc6b76bd78cf4ef52b3264d17&fmt=H | Source]]--[[Graney, S. B., & Shinn, Mark R. (2005)| Synopsis]] Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. Hall, R. P., Knudsen, J. & Greeno, J. G. (1995). A case study of systemic aspects of assessment technologies. Educational Assessment, 3(4) 315-61. [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=7403315 | Source]] -- [[Hall, R. P. (1995) | Synopsis]] Hoff, D. J.(2005). NCLB focuses on data tools. //Education Week, 24//(35), 5-17. [[http://ewdev.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35data.h24.html | Source]] -- [[Hoff, D. J. (2005) | Synopsis]] Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258-1287. [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=13298008 |Source]] -- [[Ingram, D. et al (2004) | Synopsis]]. Kennedy, M. F. (1994). Instructional design or personal heuristics in classroom instructional planning. Educational Technology, 34(3), 17-25. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Education Schools Project. [[http://www.edschools.org/teacher_report.htm|Source]] - [[Levine, A. (2006)|Notes]] Lockee, B., Moore, D., & Burton, J. (2004). Foundations of programmed instruction. In AECT handook . . . [[Lockee, B. et al (2004) | Our Synopsis]] Morrison, K. (2002). //School leadership and complexity theory.// London : RoutledgeFalmer. [[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=+School+leadership+and+complexity+theory&btnG=Search | Source]]--[[Morrison, K. (2002) | Our Synopsis ]] National Center for Education Statistics [NCES](1999). Teachers’ feelings of preparedness. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. [[http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999080.pdf | Source]] Nevada State Educational Technology Plan [[http://www.doe.nv.gov/edteam/commissions/educationtech/NVtechplan.html | Source]] - [[Nevada State Educational Technology Plan 2005 | Notes]] Streifer, P. A. (2002). Using data to make better educational decisions. London: Scarecrow Press [[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?sourceid=Mozilla-search&q=using+data+to+make+better+educational+decisions | Source]] - [[Streifer, P. A. (2002) | Notes]]. U.S. Department of Education (2004) Toward A New Golden Age in American Education: How the Internet, the Law and Today’s Students Are Revolutionizing Expectations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. [[http://www.nationaledtechplan.org/ | Source]] - [[U. S. Department of Education (2004) | Synopsis]]. [[http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/teachers-data-use-2005-2007/teachers-data-use-2005-2007-intro.html|http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/teachers-data-use-2005-2007/teachers-data-use-2005-2007-intro.html]] - U.S. Dept. of Education. Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving Teachers in Data-Driven Decision Making: Using Computer Data Systems to Support Teacher Inquiry and Reflection. //Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 10//(3), 295-308. [[http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=17137064|Abstract Link]]--[[I had a problem retrieving this article online:Source]]--[[Wayman (2005) | Our Synopsis Link]] Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S. & Millard, M. O. (2004). //Software for disaggregating and reporting student data: Moving beyond “No Child Left Behind” to inform classroom practice.// Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. [[http://www.csos.jhu.edu/datause/papers/wayman_data_systems_nclb.pdf | Source]]--[[Wayman, J. C. et al (2004) | Our Synopsis ]] Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S. & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software Enabling School Improvement Through Analysis of Student Data. [[http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techreports/report67.pdf | Source]] - [[Wayman, J. C. et al 2004a | Our Synopsis]] Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & DeYoung, T. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. //Education, Communication & Information, 5//(2), 183-206. [[http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/14636310500186214 | Source]] - [[Wood, E., et al (2005) | Notes]] {{zhao_frank_2003.pdf|Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A., (2003)}}. Factors affecting technology use in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal. 40( 4) 807-40.